A nerd after my own heart: xkcd

I don’t read comics much anymore. I used to love Doonesbury and Get Fuzzy; longer ago, of course, I loved Calvin and Hobbes. When my family still subscribed to the daily newspaper, I would immediately borrow the otherwise dull section D and browse the humor page. In college, I switched to reading a comic or two on Slate, since I didn’t have a paper paper (the redundancy is merely apparent). But that habit fizzled out after a while.

A year or so ago, though, my brother found and introduced me to a couple of online comics that I now can’t resist visiting regularly (xkcd) or at least once every week or two (Dinosaur Comics). You know xkcd is going to be good when “My Hobby,” hat guy, or velociraptors are involved. I’ll find hat guy and the raptors later, but here’s a Hobby after my own heart (=left brain gone devious).

Bookish

I love to read. I keep a list — over 250 long — of all the books that I’ve read, or most of them. A few from grade school have probably slipped my memory. And I keep a list — around 130 long — of books that I want to read. That list is missing quite a few selections, too, as I’ll make a note to the effect that “I want to read something by Hemingway.” This generally means more than one book…and I occasionally list a set of books as one.

Lately I haven’t read nearly as much as I prefer (proofreading notwithstanding). But today I finally read Alice in Wonderland. That’s right, I had never read this classic (yet sophisticated) children’s tale. Shel Silverstein yes, Lewis Carroll no. I could see better the fun that Hofstadter had writing GEB, which only made Carroll the more delightful. I got stuck on one sentence (one which I’m sure most people either get stuck on till their eyes glaze, or just plain skip):

…never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise.

Yes, I wrote it down when I saw it. (Ok, truth be told, I laughed a fair bit first.) I tried to block off the separate bits of the sentence, but I can’t make it make sense in modern English grammar.

{Insert 10-minute pause here.}

Ok, I tried to separate the tangled knots of linguistic insanity, but I would need a linguist’s expert help. If that would help, of course. If I clump one phrase in one way that makes sense, the others only get more confused. How frustating (and delicious!).

Thoughts welcome. Also, thoughts welcome on bookshelf widgets that will work on wordpress.com — I recently joined Shelfari and added all my books, even ticked off favorites, owned and wishlist books, only to find that I can’t post my bookshelf on the sidebar here. And it’s such a pretty little bookshelf, too. :sad face:

A poem for Wednesday: From the Daodejing

Under heaven all can see beauty as beauty only because there is ugliness.
All can know good as good only because there is evil.
Therefore having and not having arise together.
Difficult and easy complement each other.
Long and short contrast each other;
High and low rest upon each other;
Voice and sound harmonize each other;
Front and back follow one another.
Therefore the sage goes about doing nothing, teaching no-talking.
The ten thousand things rise and fall without cease,
Creating, yet not possessing,
Working, yet not taking credit.
Work is done, then forgotten.
Therefore it lasts forever.

` Daodejing, ch. 2

(I don’t know which translation it is.)

Project Gutenberg: First 100 pages

As I noted a couple of weeks ago, I’ve recently joined the ranks of proofreaders for the free library of classics, Project Gutenberg. Today I proofread my hundredth page at Distributed Proofreaders. So far, the books I’ve worked on include:

An old gardening/horticulture guide;
A book of myth(s) translated to English from Sanskrit;
A collection of short stories by Gustave Flaubert (in French);
A book by Paul Bourget (in French);
A text on philosophy of linguistics (with some tricksy German footnotes);

and a couple of others. I’m quite enjoying it, actually, especially the practice in French.

I even learned a ‘rule’ about writing in French that I didn’t know before: do not put accents on capital letters, even though they may belong in the lowercase. I put a note by the phrase “A la cour” asking if it ought not be À — the ‘a’ avec un accent grave that means “to” or “at”, as opposed to sans accent, which means “has.” Well. I was wrong. I had the intended word right, but apparently there is a tradition in French writing whereby it is virtually criminal to put an accent on a majuscule, a capital letter.

Proofreading also gives me something valuable to do with downtime at work. Sitting at the front desk means a variable level of busy-ness, ranging from absolutely nothing to do, and the phones might as well be dead, to six people walking in all at once, calling with both phone lines busy, asking about programs or whether the computer lab is reserved for a group, while I try to enter data from twelve new seasonal crew applicants and respond to the finance department’s email complaining that they don’t have any expense request for that such-and-such from the last supply order. You know, the one that I sent them two weeks ago. Well, when it’s an “absolutely nothing” time, it’s nice to have something to do better than browse Facebook, and I needn’t feel like a slacker because there’s really no work to do at that moment.

Well, anyway, I’m enjoying it, and if you think you might too, you should think about volunteering a little time. DP is in pretty desperate need of more experienced proofreaders — the later stages of proofreading can have backlogs of a year or more. And how are they going to get experienced proofers but by getting new proofers who stay on with them, and who stay active?

I’ll be able to move on to doing second-round proofing and first-round formatting once I’ve done another 200 pages of first-round proofing and it’s been three weeks since I joined. After that, 50 pages of round two proofing and 50 pages of round one formatting and I’ll be able to dig into some round three proofing, which is where the major backlog lies in wait.

I’ll get there, don’t you worry. :cool: